Eisenhower Presidency: An Assessment
Eisenhower (1953-1961) should be listed as one of the great
Presidents. For their own reasons academics prefer Truman and Kennedy whose
administrations pale in comparison. Just in the popularity with the American
People they are sharply in contrast. President Eisenhower’s approval rating was
close to 70%. Truman’s approval rating dipped into the 20’s% at the end of this
administration. Obama’s averaged less than 50%. Kennedy’s approval in his short
tenure was quite high at around 70%. There were no wars during his
administration. The Federal Budgets were generally balanced, something that
doesn’t currently appear to be realizable. The economy grew 37% during his administration.
Inflation was low as well. The country was tranquil at home and abroad.
Largely, upon veiled threat of use of tactical nuclear
weapons he was able to end the Korean War. The threat was communicated to India
who passed it along to the Communist Chinese. The Communist Chinese came to a
negotiated agreement that split Korea at the 38th parallel. The
agreement was against the wishes of the South Korean leader Rhee who wanted to
continue the propagation of the war but was informed if he wanted to continue the
war, it would be alone.
Eisenhower insisted on balanced budgets. He fought the
conservative wing of the Republican Party against tax cuts that might imbalance
the budget. He fought back against increases in the defense budget, as well. In
fact he sharply lowered the President Truman’s defense budget by several
billion against the opposition of the chiefs of the three branches of the
military. He saw military expenditure as coming out the hard earned labor of
the common people.
While war was threated several times, only ONE soldier died in combat under his eight
year administration. He refused to become involved in South East Asia as the
French wished he would. . Kennedy would make the mistake of becoming more
involved in South East Asia by inserting American troops into Vietnam that
eventually led to catastrophic failure.
Truman initially drew down the military too much and failed to include
Korean as within the American sphere of influence. This led to the aggression
of North Korea in 1950. Of course with adept foreign policy he concluded the
Korean War in 1953. He offered protocols to reduce the threat of nuclear war to
the Soviets. Kennedy despite keeping a cool head brought USA to the brink of
all-out nuclear war with the Soviet Union during the Cuban Missile Crisis.
Khrushchev’s secret speech in 1956 and propaganda from Radio
Free Europe led the Hungarians into thinking assistance in the event of an
uprising was forthcoming by the West in 1956. But Eisenhower stood pat as the Soviets
sent in tanks to crush the revolution in Hungary in 1956. This was a tacit confirmation
of the Yalta pact in 1945 that divided Europe into spheres of influence. It
would have taken another world war to revise it and this it would be nuclear. Eisenhower
sagaciously eschewed conflict. Four decades later the empire fell on its own
incompetence and inefficiency. Eisenhower was busy at the time in 1956 with
the Suez Crisis in which France, the UK and Israel conspired to grab back the recently
nationalized Suez Canal and secure the State of Israel. Eisenhower insisted
they give up colonial aspirations. Nasir of Egypt was allowed to nationalize
the canal and Britain and France stood down.
Kiang Kai Shek, leader of the Nationalist Chinese on Taiwan,
tried to force a war over two tiny islands, Quemoy and Matsu, within firing
distance of Communist China. China threatened to use military force to occupy
it. Kiang Kai-Shek hoped to re-ignite the civil war again mainland China with
America’s assistance. Eisenhower would have none of it.
Monetary inflation was kept to a moderate level. In contrast
during Truman administration inflation ran up to 9% in 1951. Inflation is a
product of too much money chasing too few goods. Federal Reserve’s generation
of money supply is determinate as to levels of inflation. Any price increase on
a particular product like the shortage of oil will not in itself cause general
monetary inflation, since an increase in price in one product will likely cause
a decrease in other prices. It takes something like the Central bank to effect
monetary inflation. Eisenhower’s bank exercised prudence.
Eisenhower won’t get credit for this but large urban areas were
quiet and free of upheavals seen in the Sixties. Even crime was historically
low. Eisenhower won’t get credit for that either. However, the prescription of
Civil Rights legislation of the 1960’s, no matter how much it was justified,
didn’t become the magic fix it was meant to be, as it appears from fifty years
hindsight
Civil Rights legislation of the 1960’s raised expectations
and resulted in race riots in many Cities, alienating Whites, who fled the
cities and abandoned the African-Americans in segregated Ghettos. Today these
inner cities remain pockets of poverty and crime. In Michigan where I live
Detroit and Flint are prime examples. Both were huge centers for auto
production and now are essentially devoid of any. Dozens of auto plants have
been built in America in the last four decades, most by foreign manufacturers.
None in the inner cities. Political solutions to racial issues are limited in
their efficacy, when social elements play a large part of the problem.
1957 the Soviets launched Sputnik to the shock of America. The
tiny satellite broadcast a radio signal that could be picked up around the
world. Due to budgetary constraints launching satellites were not high on
priority, the Atlas missile was designed for delivering nuclear warheads
intercontinentally. After being shown up by the Soviets, the space program
began in earnest. Kennedy would spend billions on a trip to the moon. Something
Eisenhower found largely quixotic, wanting to emphasize the military,
scientific and technical aspects.
In 1959 two weeks before a Paris summit to discuss
restraints on nuclear weapon, the Soviets shot down a U-2 spy plane. The
Eisenhower administration not aware of the details assumed that both the pilot
and planet had crashed and were destroyed. When the Soviets first reported the incident,
the Eisenhower administration lied, saying it was weather plane that strayed
off course due to a malfunction. A U-2 plane was hastily repainted with NASA
colors and sent out to the media. The Soviets latter revealed that not only had
the plane been retrieved, the pilot was alive as well. Eisenhower was caught in
a lie and the peace conference was cancelled. Relations with the Soviets
worsened.
U-2 spy flights did establish the state of the Soviets
nuclear weapon competence. They lacked the Air Force and submarine capabilities
that USA had, which was well know and had only a few ICBM’s. The USA had some 650
B-52’s, some 300 Polaris missiles deliverable by nuclear submarine plus many
more ICBM’s than the Soviets.
Kenney was informed, once nominated for the Democrat
Presidency, in 1960 that United States had a massive advantage in ICBM, plane
and submarine nuclear capability over Soviet Union. Kennedy continued to lie
about the putative missile gap in his campaign to gain voters.
Eisenhower is criticized for not addressing the civil rights
issues. Yet, the first civil rights laws in some 80 years were passed in 1957.
These were largely gutted by Senate Democrats specifically Lyndon B. Johnson,
so they didn’t have the impact of latter Civil Rights legislation. The
Dixiecrats held a strangle hold on the advancement of Civil Rights legislation
since the Reconstruction ended in the 1870’s. So, Black voter suppression and
Jim Crow segregation laws went unchallenged in the South. Something I experienced,
as a child in the 1950’s in Missouri when I saw a White’s only drinking
fountain and didn’t realize it referred to race.
Eisenhower in addition sent in Federal Troops to enforce
school integration in Little Rock, AR in 1957, segregation ordered by the
Supreme Court. Admittedly, Eisenhower had little sensitivity to Civil Rights; however
his Attorney General Herbert Brownell had much input into these issues and including
the nature of judicial picks. Neither Truman nor Kennedy worked actively for
Civil Rights in terms of legislation. In fact Kennedy voted against
Eisenhower’s Civil Rights act of 1957. No Civil Rights legislation was passed under
their administrations. Driven by events Kennedy became more sympathetic to
Civil Rights issues later in his short tenure.
Eisenhower’s Supreme Court picks of Warren and Brennan were
the forefront of judicial activism. The first ruling of the Warren Court was
Brown vs. School Board of 1954 that struck down separate but equal school
systems. The Warren Court went on to remove school prayer, insist on the
recitation of Miranda Rights to the arrested and representation being appointed,
when none was available, for the accused and the Court increased the standard
for search and seizure among other things. Eisenhower seems to get no credit
for his revolution in the Court.
Eisenhower has been criticized for secret machinations by
the Dulles’ CIA in Iraq, Guatemala, and elsewhere but these underhanded
measures where in lieu of a more upfront aggression that could have led to war.
Fear of Soviet takeover played a part in both those coup d’états.
As for Truman, highly regarded by academics, he left the
country with high inflation and what appeared to be a war without exit and an
approval rating in the 20s percentile, lowest approval rating for Presidents
since WWII. Truman also had to be forced to accept legislation that engineered
labor peace: the Taft Hartley act, passed over his veto. Prior to this labor
unrest was allowed to wreak havoc on the economy.
In balance Truman’s Marshall Plan the provided aid to war
torn Western Europe was historic and did much to restore Western Europe to
peace and prosperity. A combined military command was created under his
administration, NATO; Eisenhower was appointed to lead NATO at this time
incidentally in 1951-1952. Truman got much criticism for the failure to support
Chaing Kai-Shek Nationalists that led to the rise of Communist China and Mao
Tse Tung: a symptom of America’s historic idealistic foreign policy, revisited
several times with much failure. Examples being Wilson’s Fourteen Points at the conclusion of
WWI, Iran 1979 and Iraq in 2003, foreign policy that failed to face historical realities
and the complexities of culture, religion and politics, only wanting to create
a world made safe for Democracy.
Controversially Truman authorized the use of the atomic bomb
(something Eisenhower opposed but arguably was NOT in the decision loop) against
civilian populations in Hiroshima and Nagasaki: an act of war that continues to
be controversial in its horrific barbarity.